Medigy Logo Hospital
Person name
Published by
@ShahidNShah

CARRIS HEALTH LLC

Do you know anyone who's been to this HDO?

Watch Star Preferred HDO
Address:
301 BECKER AVE SW, WILLMAR, Kandiyohi , Minnesota , 56201
Phone:
(320) 235-4543
Rating:
Rating

General information

HDO type Hospital type :
Acute Care Hospitals
Provides emergency services:
Yes
HDO Ownership:
Government - Local
Institution type:
Healthcare Delivery Organization (HDO)
Geography Census Division:
West North Central
Geography Census Region:
Midwest

Every industry under the sun is trying to innovate using the latest technologies - and the healthcare industry is no exception. The pressure to innovate is building by the day. And let us tell you: Innovating in healthcare is not easy.

A large number of innovations come in subtler forms and shapes. Feel free to label your smaller efforts as innovations too. Improvements in your procurement process and creating a harmony between your legal and information security functions are two good examples. Onboarding new services and solutions are innovations, too.

Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed sdgdfy
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed sdgdfy
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed sdgdfy
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed sdgdfy
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed sdgdfy
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed sdgdfy
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed

Health Systems are beginning to understand the need to continuously evolve not only in what it innovates, but in how it innovates. Part of this evolution is recognizing the value in external partnerships to advance the culture of innovation.

As part of this evolution, this initiative intends to help set the standard in being easy to do business with. To this end, the initiative will work across the ecosystem to define standards to help develop approaches that both help quickly find and efficiently evaluate solutions, and methods to support adopting and scaling those solutions across our enterprise. Recognizing the necessity to measure that which is important, our group intends to first work with the industry to define what it means to be "easy to do business with".

  • Does this healthcare system support getting to a yes or no quickly?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We provide dedicated resources to support innovators
    We provide publicly available information to help innovators understand what we care about
    We provide timely communications to express interest or discontinue discussions
    We communicate and provide clear decision pathways
    We have an established and efficient due diligence pathway
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We provide dedicated resources to support innovators
    We provide publicly available information to help innovators understand what we care about
    We provide timely communications to express interest or discontinue discussions
    We communicate and provide clear decision pathways
    We have an established and efficient due diligence pathway

  • Does this healthcare system have contracting and legal processes that accommodate innovators?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have financial 'light' policies geared toward innovators
    We create equitable and favorable terms share upside gains
    We create contracts with pathways to scale
    We have a timely contracting process
    We have legal representatives familiar with working with innovators
    We have indemnity and insurance clauses that don't overly burden innovators
    We have legal departments willing to work with innovators with limited legal resources

  • Does this healthcare system have safety and research policies and processes that both protect patients, but encourage rapid discovery and evaluation?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    I would consider my system to be a "clinical research center of excellence for digital technologies
    Our IRB department has expertise supporting digital clinical trials
    We have clear policies articulating when IRB is needed for digital trials
    We have an efficient start to finish time in IRB reviews
    We have attractive IRB pricing
    Our IRB is willing to work with other health systems for multi-site research
    We have a research team that can support digital trials
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    I would consider my system to be a "clinical research center of excellence for digital technologies
    Our IRB department has expertise supporting digital clinical trials
    We have clear policies articulating when IRB is needed for digital trials
    We have an efficient start to finish time in IRB reviews
    We have attractive IRB pricing
    Our IRB is willing to work with other health systems for multi-site research
    We have a research team that can support digital trials

  • Does this healthcare system make it easy to adopt an emerging health tech solution?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have clear access to data end points (API/HL7/FHIR)
    We have an efficient integration process
    We provide attracting integration pricing to innovators
    We have onsite integration specialists
    We use standard integration pathways (network, SAML, data fields, configuration, testing, deployment)
    We have accessible enterprise cloud and middleware integration solutions
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have clear access to data end points (API/HL7/FHIR)
    We have an efficient integration process
    We provide attracting integration pricing to innovators
    We have onsite integration specialists
    We use standard integration pathways (network, SAML, data fields, configuration, testing, deployment)
    We have accessible enterprise cloud and middleware integration solutions

  • Does this healthcare system make data available?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have a common set of data stewards
    We have a standard data catalog
    We have policies related to data sharing for co-development and research
    We provide access to data sandboxes
    We can quickly extract and anonymize data sets
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have a common set of data stewards
    We have a standard data catalog
    We have policies related to data sharing for co-development and research
    We provide access to data sandboxes
    We can quickly extract and anonymize data sets

  • Does this healthcare system have clinical champions to support innovators?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We provide access to dedicated clinical champions
    We have many principal investigators dedicated to digital tech
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We provide access to dedicated clinical champions
    We have many principal investigators dedicated to digital tech

  • Does this healthcare system support business development beyond the trail/validation period?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have business development resources focused on digital tech
    We provide support and pathways to scale
    We help refer working solutions to other systems
    We provide access to growth capital
    We are willing to co-publish
    We have liberal branding and use of logo policies with partners
    We provide dedicated investment vehicles
    We provide board advisors
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    We have business development resources focused on digital tech
    We provide support and pathways to scale
    We help refer working solutions to other systems
    We provide access to growth capital
    We are willing to co-publish
    We have liberal branding and use of logo policies with partners
    We provide dedicated investment vehicles
    We provide board advisors

  • Is the healthcare system perceived to be “easy to do business with”?

    Submit your answers View others submission:
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    Innovators perceive us as being easy to work with
    Other health systems perceive us as being easy to work with
    Strongly disagree
    Disagree
    Neutral
    Agree
    Strongly agree
    Innovators perceive us as being easy to work with
    Other health systems perceive us as being easy to work with
These measures show how often or how quickly hospitals provide care that research shows gets the best results for patients with certain conditions. This information can help you compare which hospitals give recommended care most often as part of the overall care they provide to patients.
Rating

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    low
    Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit A lower number of minutes is better
    157
    Not Available
    132
    Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit- Psychiatric/Mental Health Patients. A lower number of minutes is better
    Not Available
    Not Available
    211
    Percentage of patients who left the emergency department before being seen Lower percentages are better
    1
    Not Available
    2
    Percentage of patients who came to the emergency department with stroke symptoms who received brain scan results within 45 minutes of arrival Higher percentages are better
    Not Available
    Not Available
    71

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Percentage of patients who received appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock. Higher percentages are better
    45%
    Not Available
    55%
    Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle
    86%
    Not Available
    83%
    Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle
    Not Available
    Not Available
    76%
    Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle
    73%
    Not Available
    77%
    Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle
    81%
    Not Available
    87%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination Higher percentages are better
    Not Available
    Not Available
    83%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Outpatients with chest pain or possible heart attack who got drugs to break up blood clots within 30 minutes of arrival Higher percentages are better
    Not Available
    Not Available
    28 Minutes
    Average (median) number of minutes before outpatients with chest pain or possible heart attack who needed specialized care were transferred to another hospital A lower number of minutes is better
    Not Available
    Not Available
    58 Minutes

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Percentage of patients receiving appropriate recommendation for follow-up screening colonoscopy Higher percentages are better
    100%
    Not Available
    90%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Percentage of patients who had cataract surgery and had improvement in visual function within 90 days following the surgery Higher percentages are better
    Not Available
    Not Available
    100%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Percentage of patients receiving appropriate radiation therapy for cancer that has spread to the bone Higher percentages are better
    77%
    Not Available
    90%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
    Percent of mothers whose deliveries were scheduled too early (1-2 weeks early), when a scheduled delivery was not medically necessaryLower percentages are better
    0%
    Not Available
    3%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Minnesota AVERAGE
    NATIONAL AVERAGE
These measures show how often or how quickly hospitals provide care that research shows gets the best results for patients with certain conditions. This information can help you compare which hospitals give recommended care most often as part of the overall care they provide to patients.
Rating

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    National Results
    Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    2.4
    Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    3.63
    Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    1.20

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    National Results
    Death rate for heart attack patients
    Number of Cases Too Small
    12.3
    Death rate for CABG surgery patients
    Not Available
    2.9
    Death rate for COPD patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    8.1
    Death rate for heart failure patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    11.2
    Death rate for pneumonia patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    15.3
    Death rate for stroke patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    13.5
    Pressure ulcer rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    0.59
    Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications
    Number of Cases Too Small
    159.03
    Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    0.23
    In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    0.10
    Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    2.55
    Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    1.42
    Postoperative respiratory failure rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    5.03
    Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    3.63
    Postoperative sepsis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    4.90
    Postoperative wound dehiscence rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    0.86
    CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite
    No Different Than the National Value
    1.00

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Death rate for heart attack patients
    Number of Cases Too Small
    Death rate for CABG surgery patients
    Not Available
    Death rate for COPD patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Death rate for heart failure patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Death rate for pneumonia patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Death rate for stroke patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Pressure ulcer rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications
    Number of Cases Too Small
    Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Postoperative respiratory failure rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Postoperative sepsis rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Postoperative wound dehiscence rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite
    No Different Than the National Value
Returning to the hospital for unplanned care disrupts patients’ lives, increases their risk of harmful events like healthcare-associated infections, and costs more money. Hospitals that give high quality care can keep patients from returning to the hospital and reduce their stay if they have to come back.
Rating

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    National Results
    Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients
    No Different Than the National Rate
    18.6%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    National Results
    Hospital return days for heart attack patients
    Number of Cases Too Small
    Not Available
    Hospital return days for heart failure patients
    Average Days per 100 Discharges
    3%
    Hospital return days for pneumonia patients
    Average Days per 100 Discharges
    -23.1%
    Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgery
    No Different than expected
    1%
    Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission Rate
    Number of Cases Too Small
    Not Available
    Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission Rate
    No Different Than the National Rate
    21.7%

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    National Results
    Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)
    No Different Than the National Rate
    16.5%
    Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy
    No Different Than the National Rate
    11.6%
    Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy
    No Different Than the National Rate
    5.7%
    Rate of readmission for CABG
    Not Available
    Not Available

The Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB or “Medicare hospital spending per patient”) measure shows whether Medicare spends more, less, or about the same on an episode of care for a Medicare patient treated in a specific inpatient hospital compared to how much Medicare spends on an episode of care across all inpatient hospitals nationally. This measure includes all Medicare Part A and Part B payments made for services provided to a patient during an episode of care, which includes the 3 days prior to the hospital stay, the inpatient hospital stay, and the 30 days after discharge from the hospital.

The MSPB measure score is a ratio calculated by dividing the amount Medicare spent per patient for an episode of care initiated at this hospital by the median (or middle) amount Medicare spent per episode of care nationally. A lower ratio means that Medicare spent less per patient.

A ratio equal to the national average means that Medicare spends ABOUT THE SAME per patient for an episode of care initiated at this hospital as it does per episode of care across all inpatient hospitals nationally.

A ratio that is more than the national average means that Medicare spends MORE per patient for an episode of care initiated at this hospital than it does per episode of care across all inpatient hospitals nationally.

A ratio that is less than the national average means that Medicare spends LESS per patient for an episode of care initiated at this hospital than it does per episode of care across all inpatient hospitals nationally.

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    National Average Payment
    Payment for heart attack patients
    Number of Cases Too Small
    Not Available
    Payment for heart failure patients
    No Different Than the National Average Payment
    $19,545
    Payment for pneumonia patients
    No Different Than the National Average Payment
    $17,562
    Payment for hip/knee replacement patients
    No Different Than the National Average Payment
    $19,718

  • Measure Description
    CARRIS HEALTH LLC
    Value of Care Heart Attack measure
    Not Available
    Value of Care Heart Failure measur
    Average Mortality and Average Payment
    Value of Care Pneumonia measure
    Average Mortality and Average Payment
    Value of Care hip/knee replacement
    Average Complications and Average Payment

"Given the wide variation in both pricing and collection practices by hospitals, measures of billing practices are needed," the authors stated in the JAMA article. "Billing quality is a type of medical quality."

In the same way that medical complication rates are collected for improvement purposes and some are available to the public, metrics of billing quality could be used to create public accoundability for US hospitals.

Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Patient data access is indeed a ‘right’ patients have always had under HIPAA. The HIPAA privacy rule states that healthcare organizations must grant patients access to their own medical records in a reasonable amount of time for a reasonable, labor-based fee. Interoperable EHRs and patient portals have streamlined this process, making patient data access almost entirely digital and opening up opportunities in the patient engagement space. About 90 percent of clinicians and hospitals offer patient portal access, and although subpar patient adoption presents a challenge, industry leaders are eagerly working on what’s next for patient data access.
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
The healthcare industry will continue to connect patients with their own health data with the least amount of friction. Now more than ever, healthcare organizations must work to revamp their customer experience. To achieve this, it is imperative leaders leverage the right solutions to identify and eliminate friction from what should be the simplest aspects of the care experience: buying a health plan and scheduling an appointment. Eliminating the friction in these interactions can build the foundation for the convenient care experience patients deserve.
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
Not answered Endorsed (0) This HDO is not claimed
HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) is a national survey that asks patients about their experiences during a recent hospital stay. Use the results shown here to compare hospitals based on 10 important hospital quality topics.
Rating
  • Icon

Medigy Innovation Network

Connecting innovation decision makers to authoritative information, institutions, people and insights.

Medigy Logo

The latest News, Insights & Events

Medigy accurately delivers healthcare and technology information, news and insight from around the world.

The best products, services & solutions

Medigy surfaces the world's best crowdsourced health tech offerings with social interactions and peer reviews.

© 2024 Netspective Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Built on Nov 25, 2024 at 2:32am

This website uses cookies

These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this information in order to improve and customize your browsing experience, and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Cookie Policy.

Please consent to the use of cookies before continuing to browse our site.