Published by
@ShahidNShah
@ShahidNShah
How flawed legal reasoning can tilt medical malpractice cases
Inductive reasoning in medical malpractice cases often results in flawed decisions, while deductive reasoning, based on 95% confidence, provides more reliable outcomes.
Actually, Churchill never said this. It may have been Ian Gilmour, a member of Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet, years after Churchill’s death. Nevertheless, this quote is often cited in the context of risk management. It is as relevant in a medical malpractice lawsuit as it is a warning to malpractice attorneys. No matter how elegant the legal strategy upon which a malpractice lawsuit may be based, the result is a 66.7% chance the lawsuit is frivolous.
Continue reading at kevinmd.com
Make faster decisions with community advice
- Credentialing software helps Bozeman Health reduce turnaround times, reallocate 2 FTEs
- Top Diabetes Companies On The Way To The Artificial Pancreas
- From Wearables to Apps: The Role of Fitness Technology in Enhancing Sports Nutrition
- Why Physical Therapy EMR is Key to Improving Patient Satisfaction
- How TMS Therapy Supports Mental Health Recovery in Patients with PTSD?
Next Article
-
Top Diabetes Companies On The Way To The Artificial Pancreas
The Medical Futurist collected the top diabetes companies aiming to make diabetes management and monitoring as easy as possible. Diabetes has been around for centuries, if not even for thousands of …
Posted Oct 25, 2024 Diabetes Education PHO (Physician Hospital Organization) Insight & Analysis
