data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbfd0/bbfd0796c5136297a0465a6a0e1eb893a5d763f4" alt="Shahid Sha Person name"
@ShahidNShah
Genomics needs more talented software engineers.
There is a significant gap between how software is currently developed in this space versus how it should be developed. The vast majority of genomics-related software is not written with speed or reliability in mind. Too often, projects have no documentation within the code itself and no tests. Instead, a single individual who built the tool and has worked with the code since its inception is solely responsible for ensuring that the results "still look good" between releases (in an ad hoc manner, no less)—a claim that I think is incredibly generous given the breadth and complexity of evaluating genomics results. This state of affairs makes it difficult for anyone other than the original author to contribute to these code bases, further cementing the one-maintainer policy.
Continue reading at claymcleod.dev
Both healthcare delivery organizations (HDOs) and start-ups have much to gain from collaboration, but corporate venture capital investments need a clear strategy, focus, and operating model. What …
Posted Nov 20, 2022 Digital Health Innovation
Connecting innovation decision makers to authoritative information, institutions, people and insights.
Medigy accurately delivers healthcare and technology information, news and insight from around the world.
Medigy surfaces the world's best crowdsourced health tech offerings with social interactions and peer reviews.
© 2025 Netspective Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Built on Feb 21, 2025 at 1:11pm