@ShahidNShah
To Tokenize Or Not Tokenize – The Truth About Scope And Compliance Risk
The hard-to-face reality is that billions of personal records are exposed each year. A commonly used, yet incomplete solution, is tokenization. Tokenizing sensitive data does not eliminate the need to achieve and certify PCI DSS compliance. In order to completely descope from PCI, a business can partner with a data custodian (VGS) that handles 100% of data capture and vaulting – removing any compliance risk and completely avoiding data leaks.
Massive data leaks, at this point, are becoming a frequent occurrence – with headlines regularly popping up highlighting cybersecurity disasters that have impacted millions of consumers.
Earlier this summer, news of a cybersecurity disaster rattled North American consumers. The highly-publicized Capital One data breach of 2019 led to the sensitive data exposure of 100 million Americans and 6 million Canadians – including hundreds of thousands of social security numbers and bank account numbers.
Continue reading at blog.verygoodsecurity.com
Make faster decisions with community advice
- Providers, payers and pharma must work together to thwart cyber criminals
- Kaiser Permanente CEO Tyson Dies Unexpectedly at 60
- Cybersecurity in Hospitals: A Systematic, Organizational Perspective
- Data Breach Costs Texas Health Agency $1.6 Million
- Hackers encrypt data on some servers of Brooklyn Hospital Center
Next Article
-
Providers, payers and pharma must work together to thwart cyber criminals
When it comes to building cybersecurity defenses against bad actors in healthcare, generally speaking each provider organization, payer or pharmaceutical company relies on its own self-developed …
Posted Nov 12, 2019cybersecuritypharmaproviders