@ShahidNShah
Is This the Holy GRAIL for Cancer Detection?
Let’s start with the good news, specificity is high across all cancer types and the mean specificity across all of them is 99.5%. Specificity is a measure for the true negative rate, that is: given that you do not have cancer, how likely is the test to return a negative result? This measure is important for a screening method as a low specificity leads to a higher number of false positives. False positives in cancer screening can lead to unnecessary follow-up scans and biopsies which are costly for the healthcare system and harmful for the patient.
Interpreting the sensitivity of Galleri is more complicated. Sensitivity tells us the test’s ability to find cancer. In aggregate across all cancer types and stages, Galleri has a sensitivity of 51.5%, meaning that roughly half of all cancers are missed.
Continue reading at arsham.substack.com
Make faster decisions with community advice
- "Missed Opportunity": What Can Be Learned From AI's Failures
- 5 Things CIOs Need to Consider When Moving to the Cloud
- 7 Ways to Improve Patient Outcomes in the New World of Value-Based Care
- Five Barriers to Digital Transformation and How to Overcome Them
- From Theranos to Google Glass: The Biggest Flops in Digital Health
Next Article
-
A Healthcare CIO’s Guide to HIPAA Compliance in Co-working Spaces
When you look at the cost of a new hospital, it’s incredibly expensive. The proposed replacement for IU Health Methodist and University Hospitals is forecast to cost $1.6 billion dollars and have 576 …