
@ShahidNShah
From the hospital side, several factors are forcing providers to get creative. Census levels are high nationwide, often near full capacity and beyond. Staff rolls are shrinking as growing numbers of clinicians quit because of burnout or unmitigated stress. There’s not enough money to build new brick-and-mortar facilities. And then, lordy, there was the pandemic – many organizations had a crash course in virtual care, forced by restrictions on in-person encounters, full COVID caseloads and nearly instantaneous changes in reimbursement policy that enabled virtual care.And patients – well, they weren’t big fans of being in the hospital before. The pandemic opened their eyes to the possibility of virtual care, and nascent hospital-at-home programs revealed alternatives to traditional delivery of acute care services.
Like many “new” trends in healthcare, the hospital at home movement is not new. The foundational research goes back nearly 30 years, to work by Bruce Leff, MD, of Johns Hopkins to flesh out the concept of providing acute-level care to patients in their own homes.As hospitals increasingly treat sicker and older patients, hospital at home programs represent a way to offload patient load from nursing staff, better apportioning patients to the most appropriate setting and enabling nurses to focus on the most needy patients.
Continue reading at healthdatamanagement.com
The annual cost of hospital care services in the US has risen to over $1 trillion despite relatively worse health outcomes compared to similar nations. These trends accentuate a growing need for …
Connecting innovation decision makers to authoritative information, institutions, people and insights.
Medigy accurately delivers healthcare and technology information, news and insight from around the world.
Medigy surfaces the world's best crowdsourced health tech offerings with social interactions and peer reviews.
© 2025 Netspective Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Built on Feb 21, 2025 at 1:11pm